< Prev | Next > |
---|
There are no translations available.
Abstract
This article investigates the link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and the reasons for which legitimacy
is ascribed or denied. It fills a gap in the literature on CSR and legitimacy that lacks empirical studies regarding the question
whether CSR contributes to organisational legitimacy. The problem is discussed by referring to the case of De Beers’s diamond
mining partnership with the Government of Namibia. A total of 42 interviews were conducted—41 with stakeholders and one with
the focal organisation Namdeb. The 41 stakeholder interviews are analysed with regard to cognitive, pragmatic and moral legitimacy
as defined by Suchman (Acad Manage Rev 20(3):571–610, 1995). The main finding is that the majority of statements on organisational legitimacy refer to moral legitimacy and most issues
raised in this context challenge the company’s legitimacy despite its comprehensive CSR engagement. The study demonstrates
that legitimacy gaps can be a result of communication practices that raise unrealistic stakeholder expectations and that the
legitimacy gained by CSR engagement in one area cannot substitute legitimacy losses caused by failures in another.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Pages 1-20
- DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1045-0
- Authors
- Cyrlene Claasen, Management and Organisation Department, ESC Rennes School of Business, 2, rue Robert d’Arbrissel, 35065 Rennes, France
- Julia Roloff, Management and Organisation Department, ESC Rennes School of Business, 2, rue Robert d’Arbrissel, 35065 Rennes, France
- Journal Journal of Business Ethics
- Online ISSN 1573-0697
- Print ISSN 0167-4544